v04.n3170
 1: Re: 
 2: Re: DR and Damage
 3: Re: D20 vs GURPS?
 4: that armor thang....
 5: Re: 
 6: Re: 
 7: Re: social status
 8: Re: social status
 9: Re: The Bells of Time
10: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
11: Re: About effective skill below 3 and "no roll allowed"...
12: Re: About effective skill below 3 and "no roll allowed"...
13: Re: The Bells of Time
14: Gurps Conspiracy X
15: R: About effective skill below 3 and "no roll allowed"...
16: R: 
17: Re: social status
18: Re: social status
19: Re: The Bells of Time
20: Re: abstracted netrunning

v04.n3171
 1: Re: The Bells of Time
 2: Re: social status
 3: Re: About effective skill below 3 and "no roll allowed"
 4: Re: social status
 5: Re: newbie question (DR)
 6: Re: your mail
 7: R: newbie question (DR) And ablative armor
 8: ablative armor
 9: Re: abstracted netrunning
10: Re: abstracted netrunning
11: Re: Gurps Conspiracy X
12: Re: social status
13: Re: The Bells of Time
14: Re: social status
15: Re: Gurps Conspiracy X
16: Re: D20 vs GURPS?
17: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
18: So where do I send her?
19: Re: Gurps Conspiracy X
20: Wealth (was Re: social status)
21: Re: abstracted netrunning
22: languages
23: Re: So where do I send her?
24: Re: abstracted netrunning
25: Re: So where do I send her?
26: R: languages
27: Re: So where do I send her?
28: Re: R: languages

v04.n3172
 1: Re: R: languages
 2: Re: Gurps Conspiracy X
 3: Re: Wealth (was Re: social status)
 4: Re: Wealth (was Re: social status)
 5: Re: abstracted netrunning
 6: Vehicle Question: Flying Wing
 7: Re: Vehicle Question: Flying Wing
 8: Re: (No Subject, DR question)
 9: Ablating non-ablative armor
10: Re: Vehicle Question:  Foam Blocks
11: Re: So where do I send her?
12: Re: So where do I send her?
13: Re: ablative armor
14: Re: Gurps Conspiracy X
15: Re: languages
16: Re: So where do I send her?
17: Re: ablative armor
18: Re: languages
19: ablative armor vs. ablative DR
20: Re: (No Subject, DR question)
21: Re: So where do I send her?
22: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
23: Re: So where do I send her?
24: RE: Anti Vampire Rounds
25: RE: The Bells of Time
26: RE: Surgical Interface conc. points
27: K, guys, I know y'all are getting these too....
28: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
29: Re: The Bells of Time

v04.n3173
 1: interface sockets & the brain
 2: Re: abstracted netrunning
 3: Re: ablative armor
 4: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
 5: RE: Surgical Interface conc. points
 6: Re: The Bells of Time
 7: RE: The Bells of Time
 8: RE: Surgical Interface conc. points
 9: Sorry was: [RE: Surgical Interface conc. points]
10: interesting news story
11: Re: So where do I send her?
12: Re: So where do I send her?
13: RE: D20 vs GURPS?
14: RE: abstracted netrunning
15: Here's where she's going ...
16: Re: So where do I send her?

v04.n3174
 1: Re: abstracted netrunning
 2: Re: ablative armor vs. ablative DR
 3: Re: abstracted netrunning
 4: Re: The Bells of Time
 5: Re: abstracted netrunning
 6: RE: Surgical Interface conc. points
 7: Archery examination...
 8: Re: abstracted netrunning
 9: MEME  was: RE: abstracted netrunning
10: Virus's was: RE: abstracted netrunning
11: Re: MEME  was: RE: abstracted netrunning
12: R: Archery examination...
13: Re: Virus's was: RE: abstracted netrunning
14: Re: R: Archery examination...
15: Re: Virus's was: RE: abstracted netrunning
16: RE: Virus's was: RE: abstracted netrunning
17: Re: Here's where she's going ...
18: Re: Archery examination...
19: R: Archery examination...
20: R: Archery examination...
21: Re: Virus's was: RE: abstracted netrunning

v04.n3175
 1: Re: Archery examination...
 2: Re: R: Archery examination...
 3: Re: R: Archery examination...
 4: Re: Archery examination...
 5: Re: Here's where she's going ...
 6: Re: Archery examination...
 7: Re: Here's where she's going ...
 8: Re: Here's where she's going ...
 9: request for advice for amuture gming
10: pulp adventure for GURPS
11: Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
12: Re: (No Subject, DR question)
13: [VEHICLES] of the week 328 - hydrofoil and MRL drop sled
14: Re: Vehicle Question: Flying Wing
15: Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
16: RE: Archery examination...
17: Re: R: Archery examination...

v04.n3176
 1: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
 2: RE: Archery examination...
 3: Where has the ARMOURER gone? (was Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
 4: Re: request for advice for amuture gming
 5: Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
 6: Re: R: Archery examination...
 7: character of the week #36a

v04.n3177
 1: character of the week #36b
 2: Wits?
 3: R: Wits?
 4: Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
 5: Re: Archery examination...
 6: Re: pulp adventure for GURPS
 7: Re: D20 vs GURPS?
 8: Re: abstracted netrunning
 9: Re: Archery examination...
10: real computer
11: Re: Archery examination...
12: Re: Virus's
13: Re: abstracted netrunning
14: Re: Archery examination...
15: Re: real computer
16: Re: request for advice for amuture gming

v04.n3178
 1: Re: real computer
 2: Re: Archery examination...
 3: Re: R: Wits?
 4: Archery accuracy mods (was Archery examination...)
 5: RE: Archery examination...
 6: RE: real computer
 7: Re: real computer
 8: Re: real computer
 9: Re: Archery accuracy mods (was Archery examination...)
10: Re: real computer
11: Re: real computer
12: RE: real computer
13: Re: real computer
14: Re: Recoilless Rifles errata no reduced weight in VE2
15: Re: real computer
16: RE: real computer
17: Re: Archery accuracy mods (was Archery examination...)
18: Re: real computer
19: Re: real computer
20: Re: real computer
21: RE: real computer
22: Re: Archery examination...

v04.n3179
 1: Re: The Bells of Time
 2: Re: abstracted netrunning
 3: Re: real computer
 4: RE: real computer
 5: Re: real computer
 6: sticking to definitions was:RE: real computer
 7: Re: Archery examination...
 8: R: Archery examination...
 9: Re: Archery examination...
10: RE: real computer
11: Re: The Bells of Time
12: R: The Bells of Time
13: RE: real computer
14: Re: Wits?
15: Re: Archery accuracy mods
16: Re: Archery examination...
17: Re: real computer
18: Re: Archery examination...
19: Re: real computer
20: Re: Archery examination...
21: RE: Archery examination...
22: RE: Archery examination...
23: RE: Archery examination...
24: Re: Archery examination...

v04.n3180
 1: RE: real computer
 2: Re: Archery examination...
 3: RE: Archery examination...
 4: Re: Vehicle Question: Flying Wing
 5: Re: Archery accuracy mods
 6: Re: Archery examination...
 7: Re: Wits?
 8: Re: Here's where she's going ...
 9: RE: Archery examination...
10: RE: Archery examination...
11: RE: Here's where she's going ...
12: RE: Vehicle Question: Flying Wing
13: RE: Archery examination...
14: Re: Archery examination...
15: Re: Archery accuracy mods
16: Bracing for Bows
17: RE: real computer
18: Re: Here's where she's going ...
19: Re: Archery examination...
20: Re: Archery examination...
21: RE: Archery examination...

v04.n3182
 1: Re: The Bells of Time
 2: Re: Archery examination...
 3: RE: Archery examination...
 4: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
 5: Re: Archery examination...
 6: Re: Enough of this!
 7: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 8: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
 9: R: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
10: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
11: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
12: RE: Here's where she's going ...
13: Re: R: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
14: RE: Here's where she's going ...
15: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
16: Re: Here's where she's going ...
17: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
18: Re: Archery examination...
19: viruses & cyberdecks
20: RE: Here's where she's going ...
21: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
22: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows

v04.n3183
 1: RE: Archery examination... and Sling Question
 2: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 3: Re: [STARSHIP] 800-ton Shotel-class Mercenary Cruiser, TL10
 4: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 5: Re: Archery accuracy mods
 6: digest 3181 MIA
 7: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 8: RE: viruses & cyberdecks
 9: RE: R: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
10: Re: Here's where she's going ...
11: RE: Bows v. X-bows
12: Re: Archery accuracy mods
13: R: Bows v. X-bows

v04.n3184
 1: Re: Archery accuracy mods
 2: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
 3: TL 5+1 Flying Platform needed! Help!
 4: TL 5+1 Flying Platform needed! Help!
 5: RE: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
 6: Re: R: Bows v. X-bows
 7: RE: Bows v. X-bows
 8: Re: Archery accuracy mods
 9: Re: TL 5+1 Flying Platform needed! Help!
10: Re: and Sling Question
11: the min-max disadvantage
12: Re: Bows v. X-bows
13: Re: Bows v. X-bows
14: Re: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
15: =?iso-8859-1?Q?I=E4_Stat!_Stat_Normalisation_of_the_woods_with_a_thousand?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_young!_=28was_about_archery=29?=
16: RE: TL 5+1 Flying Platform needed! Help!

v04.n3185
 1: Re: dr. cavor
 2: RE: Here's where she's going ...
 3: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 4: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 5: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 6: RE: viruses & cyberdecks
 7: RE: R: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 8: Re: the min-max disadvantage
 9: Re: the min-max disadvantage
10: Re: Iä Stat! Stat Normalisation of the woods with a thousand young! (was about archery)
11: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_I=E4_Stat!_Stat_Normalisation_of_the_?=  woods with a thousand young! (was about archery)
12: I need expert assistance
13: I need expert assistance
14: Re: Wealth (was Re: social status)
15: Re: Bows v. X-bows
16: Re: the min-max disadvantage
17: Re: Wealth (was Re: social status)
18: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
19: RE: Bows v. X-bows
20: RE: Bows v. X-bows
21: RE: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
22: RE: Bows v. X-bows
23: Re: Bows v. X-bows

v04.n3187
 1: Re: Stat_Normalisation
 2: Re: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
 3: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 4: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 5: Re: Stat Normalisation of the woods
 6: Re: Stat_Normalisation
 7: Re: Location 5 (Head or Face?)
 8: skill descriptions/meanings
 9: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
10: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
11: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
12: RE: I need expert assistance
13: RE: I need expert assistance
14: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
15: Re: Bows v. X-bows

v04.n3188
 1: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
 2: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 3: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 4: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 5: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 6: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 7: Re: Here's where she's going ...
 8: 3186 MIA
 9: Re: Bows v. X-bows
10: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
11: high stats,  skill levels, and magic
12: Re: Stat Normalisation of the woods
13: Re: skill descriptions/meanings

v04.n3189
 1: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
 2: Re: high stats,  skill levels, and magic
 3: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
 4: Its Zombie Threads Season was: RE: Stat_Normalisation
 5: RE: Stat_Normalisation
 6: Re: [STARSHIP] 800-ton Shotel-class Mercenary Cruiser, TL10
 7: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 8: RE: Bows v. X-bows
 9: RE: Bows v. X-bows
10: Re: Here's where she's going ...
11: RE: Bows v. X-bows
12: RE: Bows v. X-bows
13: RE: Bows v. X-bows
14: RE: Bows v. X-bows
15: Re: [STARSHIP] 800-ton Shotel-class Mercenary Cruiser, TL10
16: Re: [STARSHIP] 800-ton Shotel-class Mercenary Cruiser, TL10
17: Re: high stats,  skill levels, and magic
18: seasickness
19: Re: seasickness
20: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
21: Re: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)

v04.n3190
 1: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 2: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 3: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 4: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 5: Re: [STARSHIP] 800-ton Shotel-class Mercenary Cruiser, TL10
 6: Re: seasickness
 7: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
 8: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
 9: Re: viruses & cyberdecks
10: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
11: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
12: Re: Stat Normalisation of the woods
13: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
14: Re: Here's where she's going ...

v04.n3191
 1: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 2: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 3: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 4: Re: seasickness
 5: Whopping Big Spells!
 6: Burning Ships (was Re:Seasickness)
 7: Re: Bows v. X-bows
 8: RE: 3186 MIA
 9: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
10: Re: Whopping Big Spells!
11: Re: Whopping Big Spells!
12: Age of Sail Link
13: Re: Whopping Big Spells! (fwded on request)
14: RE: Bows v. X-bows
15: RE: Bows v. X-bows
16: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
17: RE: Bows v. X-bows
18: RE: 3186 MIA
19: Re: skill descriptions/meanings
20: Re: Whopping Big Spells!
21: Re: Whopping Big Spells!
22: las vagas in the 22 century

v04.n3192
 1: Re: las vagas in the 22 century
 2: Re: las vagas in the 22 century
 3: Re: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 4: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
 5: RE: seasickness
 6: RE: Enough of this!  KROMM? was: RE: Bracing for Bows
 7: R: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
 8: RE: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
 9: R: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
10: Advanced sensors - bah!
11: Re: 3186 MIA
12: Re: Seasickness
13: Re: R: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
14: Re: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
15: Re: high stats,  skill levels, and magic
16: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
17: RE: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
18: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
19: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question

v04.n3193
 1: Re: R: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
 2: that armor and realism thing........
 3: RE: Archery examination... and Sling Question
 4: RE: that armor and realism thing........
 5: RE: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
 6: RE: R: armor and realism (Was Re: bows vs. x-bows)
 7: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
 8: Re: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
 9: RE: Archery examination... and Sling Question
10: RE: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
11: Re: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
12: I get all the c*** jobs.
13: Re: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
14: Combat Simulator
15: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
16: RE: I get all the c*** jobs.
17: Re: that armor and realism thing........
18: Re: Combat Simulator
19: Vehicle Combat For Dummies
20: Re: that armor and realism thing........
21: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
22: RE: Combat Simulator
23: RE: that armor and realism thing........
24: RE: I get all the c*** jobs.
25: Re: that armor and realism thing........

v04.n3194
 1: mecha question
 2: mecha thing again
 3: Re: mecha question
 4: KROMM: GURPS canon rules?
 5: Re: mecha question
 6: transition to TL 8
 7: Re: transition to TL 8
 8: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
 9: found a problem with the mecha and GVD
10: [VEHICLES] of the week 329 - ether flyer, minifighter and MRL sled
11: Words for Fantays Fans: armigerous
12: Re: KROMM: GURPS canon rules?
13: I could use some advice

v04.n3195
 1: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 2: body features question....help!!!!
 3: Re: I could use some advice
 4: RE: transition to TL 8
 5: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
 6: Re: mecha thing again
 7: Re: body features question....help!!!!
 8: Re: The Bodkin Experiment.{LONG}
 9: RE: las vagas in the 22 century
10: Re: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
11: Test
12: RE: Combat Simulator
13: prostituion laws
14: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
15: Re: prostituion laws
16: warrake
17: Re: prostituion laws
18: RE: RE: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
19: Re: found a problem with the mecha and GVD
20: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
21: Re: found a problem with the mecha and GVD
22: Fwd: Re: prostituion laws
23: Re: prostituion laws
24: Re: and Sling Question

v04.n3196
 1: Re: that armor and realism thing...
 2: encumbrance
 3: Re: I get all the c*** jobs.
 4: Re: I could use some advice
 5: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
 6: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
 7: Re: that armor and realism thing...
 8: Re: transition to TL 8
 9: Re: I could use some advice
10: RE: Prostitution Laws
11: RE: Combat Simulator
12: Mercury tipped bullets
13: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
14: Re: Combat Simulator
15: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
16: Re: Combat Simulator
17: Re: Combat Simulator
18: Re: that armor and realism thing...
19: Re: Combat Simulator
20: Q: How big is my crater?
21: stats on hyperion battlecruser
22: RE: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
23: warrake-description
24: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
25: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
26: GURPS:Harn

v04.n3197
 1: Re: GURPS:Harn
 2: Dual Weapon Attack
 3: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 4: Re: and Sling Question
 5: RE: and Sling Question
 6: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 7: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: SLingshots, was: RE: and Sling Question
 9: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
10: RE: Mercury tipped bullets
11: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
12: Re: GURPS:Harn
13: RE: RE: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
14: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
15: RE: encumbrance
16: RE: that armor and realism thing...
17: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
18: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
19: Re: that armor and realism thing...
20: Re: body features question....help!!!!
21: Re: found a problem with the mecha and GVD
22: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
23: Re: Mercury tipped bullets
24: Re: GURPS:Harn
25: R: that armor and realism thing...

v04.n3198
 1: Re: Mercury tipped bullets
 2: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 3: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 4: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
 5: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 6: Re: found a problem with the mecha and GVD
 7: Technomancer 2050 adventure idea
 8: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
 9: Re: Mercury tipped bullets
10: Anachronistic Vehicle Components was: Re: found a problem ... mecha and GVD
11: Anachronistic Vehicles was: Re: found a problem ... Mecha ... GVD
12: RE: RE: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
13: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
14: RE: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
15: Re: mecha question
16: Re: [SotF] Fleet Character Templates
17: Re: GT: Problems in Jumpspace
18: Re: stats on hyperion battlecruser
19: character of the week #37a

v04.n3199
 1: character of the week #37b
 2: character of the week #37c
 3: COTW #37 - late
 4: RE: Anachronistic Vehicle Components was: Re: found a problem ... mecha and GVD
 5: R: Dual Weapon Attack
 6: Re: and Sling Question
 7: Re: Technomancer 2050 adventure idea
 8: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 9: daze spell
10: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
11: Re: SLingshots

v04.n3200
 1: encumbrance weight multipliers
 2: krommnotes??
 3: Re: that armor and realism thing...
 4: Re: Technomancer 2050 adventure idea
 5: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 6: Re: Anachronistic Vehicles
 7: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: Re: Anachronistic Vehicle Components
 9: Re: Technomancer 2050 adventure idea
10: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
11: Anachronistic Vehicles vs Golems
12: Gadgeteering control
13: Re: Gadgeteering control
14: Re: Gadgeteering control
15: Re: Anachronistic Vehicles vs Golems
16: anachronistic nanotech
17: Re: krommnotes??
18: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
19: RE: encumbrance weight multipliers
20: RE: Gadgeteering control
21: Re: prostituion laws

v04.n3201
 1: RE: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 2: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
 3: RE: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
 4: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 5: RE: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
 6: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 7: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: Re: prostituion laws
 9: Heres a question!!
10: RE: Heres a question!!
11: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
12: RE: anachronistic nanotech
13: Re: Gadgeteering control
14: Re: prostituion laws
15: Re: Heres a question!!
16: RE: Heres a question!!
17: RE: Gadgeteering control
18: Re: Gadgeteering control
19: Re: Heres a question!!
20: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
21: Re: encumbrance weight multipliers

v04.n3202
 1: Re: daze spell
 2: Re: Fusion Reactor Explosions
 3: Re: Anachronistic Vehicles vs Golems
 4: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 5: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 6: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 7: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 8: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 9: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
10: RE: anachronistic nanotech
11: Re: anachronistic nanotech
12: RE: Gadgeteering control
13: Re: Gadgeteering control
14: Re: anachronistic nanotech
15: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
16: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
17: RE: Gadgeteering control
18: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
19: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
20: R: Dual Weapon Attack
21: Re: Gadgeteering control
22: Re: the min-max disadvantage
23: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
24: Re: anachronistic nanotech
25: Re: prostituion laws
26: Re: prostituion laws
27: Looking for...

v04.n3203
 1: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 2: Re: Dual Weapon Attack
 3: Control ratings, property seizure
 4: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 5: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 6: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
 7: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: RE: encumbrance weight multipliers
 9: RE: prostituion laws
10: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
11: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
12: Re: Heres a question!!
13: Re: anachronistic nanotech
14: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
15: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
16: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
17: Re: anachronistic nanotech
18: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
19: Re: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
20: RE: prostituion laws
21: Re: Heres a question!!
22: RE: Heres a question!!
23: Re: Heres a question!!
24: RE: and Sling Question
25: USMC command structure question
26: RE: prostituion laws
27: Re: Archery examination... and Sling Question
28: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)

v04.n3204
 1: Re: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 2: Re: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)
 3: Re: krommnotes??
 4: Re: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter
 5: The Enemy Within (was Re: Dual Weapon Attack)
 6: RE: and Sling Question
 7: Re: the min-max disadvantage
 8: Re: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)
 9: Re: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)
10: RE: and Sling Question
11: Apology (Re: the min-max disadvantage)
12: Re: The Enemy Within (was Re: Dual Weapon Attack)
13: Nek Les Fu
14: an other attempt for a solution of the high attribute minmax problem
15: Re: Nek Les Fu
16: RE: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)
17: Inquiry about Dragonscroll, Inc. (silghtly off topic) 
18: RE: John Woo 'Killer' style gunfighter --> noncinematic action ge nre
19: Debt and the GURPS character
20: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
21: Re: Debt and the GURPS character
22: RE: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)

v04.n3205
 1: Re: Nek Les Fu
 2: Re: Nek Les Fu
 3: Re: USMC command structure question
 4: Re: Debt and the GURPS character
 5: re: USMC command structure question
 6: Re: Nek Les Fu
 7: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 8: Re: anachronistic nanotech
 9: Re: anachronistic nanotech
10: Re: an other attempt for a solution of the high attribute minmax problem
11: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
12: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
13: Re: Nek Les Fu
14: Re: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
15: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
16: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
17: Re: USMC command structure question
18: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
19: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
20: RE: Nek Les Fu

v04.n3206
 1: Re: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 2: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
 3: Re: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 4: Re: an other attempt for a solution of the high attribute minmax problem
 5: R: an other attempt for a solution of the high attribute minmax problem
 6: R: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 7: andi's 3D character generator
 8: Re: US Constitution (was re: prostitution laws)
 9: Re: R: an other attempt for a solution of the high attribute minmax problem
10: Re: and Sling Question
11: armour encumbrance revisions
12: Re: USMC command structure question
13: Re: the min-max disadvantage
14: Re: 'Killer' style gunfighter --> noncinematic

v04.n3207
 1: Re: Debt and the GURPS character
 2: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 3: Re: armour encumbrance revisions
 4: Re: R: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 5: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
 6: Re: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 7: Re: Nek Les Fu
 8: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 9: Re: Nek Les Fu
10: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
11: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
12: fusion power plant slice
13: Re: andi's 3D character generator
14: Re: fusion power plant slice
15: Re: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
16: Re: fusion power plant slice
17: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
18: insperation from unlikly sources
19: Crossbow STs
20: an off topic Thank you
21: an off topic Thank you
22: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
23: Re: fusion power plant slice
24: [VEHICLE] of the week 330 - Traveller TL12 MRL sled

v04.n3208
 1: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
 2: character of the week #38a
 3: character of the week #38b
 4: character of the week #38c
 5: [VEHICLE] Zephyr assault hovercraft, TL8

v04.n3209
 1: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 2: RE: Rocket propelled spears.
 3: RE: Debt and the GURPS character
 4: Magic-using mercenaries
 5: Re: andi's 3D character generator
 6: Re: armour encumbrance revisions
 7: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 8: RE: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 9: Re: Magic-using mercenaries
10: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
11: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
12: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries

v04.n3210
 1: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 2: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 3: The size of a Dreadnought
 4: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 5: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 6: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
 7: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 8: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 9: RE: The size of a dreadnought
10: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
11: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
12: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
13: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
14: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
15: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
16: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
17: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
18: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?)
19: Re: Debt
20: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
21: Re: May be off topic, but would make cool campaign idea.
22: Abuse of the OT gurps request
23: Abuse of the OT gurps request
24: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
25: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
26: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
27: Compendium Conundrum

v04.n3211
 1: Re: Compendium Conundrum
 2: Ship Names, was: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 3: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
 4: Re: Compendium Conundrum
 5: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
 6: Re: Ship Names, was: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 7: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: Re: [VEHICLE] Zephyr assault hovercraft, TL8
 9: Re: splice
10: R: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
11: Re: Compendium Conundrum
12: Re: Compendium Conundrum
13: throwing speed/velocity [KROMM?]
14: Re: Abuse of the OT gurps request -> On Topic comments
15: RE: gunfighters --> noncinematic
16: RE: Compendium Conundrum --> Supers, Psionics, Magic or Ultra-tec h?
17: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
18: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
19: Re: Ship Names
20: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
21: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
22: Re: Compendium Conundrum --> Supers, Psionics, Magic or Ultra-tech?
23: Re: [VEHICLE] Zephyr assault hovercraft, TL8
24: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries

v04.n3212
 1: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 2: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 3: Re: Debt
 4: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
 5: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 6: Re: Compendium Conundrum
 7: Re: Compendium Conundrum
 8: Re: Conundrum --> Supers, Psionics, Magic or Ultra-tech?
 9: Bee-speak
10: Re: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for  regular spells?)
11: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
12: Re: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?)
13: Somethign of possible interest ...
14: RE: Re: Ship Names
15: Re: splice
16: Re: [VEHICLE] Zephyr assault hovercraft, TL8
17: TL11 Space Battleship (was: The size of a Dreadnought)

v04.n3213
 1: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 2: Re: [VEHICLE] Zephyr assault hovercraft, TL8
 3: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
 4: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 5: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 6: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 7: Re: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 8: Re: R: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
 9: Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?
10: Re: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for  regular spells?)
11: RE: Re: Ship Names
12: Re: R: R: Dual Weapon Attack Revised for Realistic Games
13: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
14: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
15: Re: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for regular spells?)
16: Re: Continuous Casting Rule( was Re: "Slow and Sure" adaptation for  regular spells?)
17: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
18: RE: Conundrum --> Supers, Psionics, Magic or Ultra-tech?
19: Re: The size of a Dreadnought

v04.n3214
 1: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 2: RE: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 3: GCA Request
 4: RE: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 5: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
 6: Re: Bee-speak
 7: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
 8: RE: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 9: Re: TL5/TL5+1 Analytical Engine Queries
10: RE: RE: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
11: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
12: Re: Conundrum --> Supers, Psionics, Magic or Ultra-tech?
13: Martial Arts Character
14: Re: Martial Arts Character
15: Re: Martial Arts Character
16: Re: Martial Arts Character
17: Re: Martial Arts Character
18: Re: Martial Arts Character
19: Re: Martial Arts Character
20: Symbols of ships
21: Re: Symbols of ships

v04.n3215
 1: RE: RE: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 2: Re: Symbols of ships
 3: Re: Symbols of ships
 4: Re: Symbols of ships 
 5: Re: Martial Arts Character
 6: Re: Martial Arts Character
 7: Re: Martial Arts Character
 8: Re: Martial Arts Character
 9: Re: Symbols of ships
10: Re[2]: Symbols of ships
11: Off in left field  -- software to build character
12: Re: GCA Request
13: Re: Off in left field  -- software to build character
14: RE: RE: RE: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
15: Re: Rocket propelled spears.
16: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
17: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8

v04.n3216
 1: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
 2: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
 3: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
 4: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
 5: Re: Symbols of ships
 6: Buckshot Nuclear Space Bomblet.
 7: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
 8: Re: Symbols of ships
 9: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
10: Re: Martial Arts Character
11: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
12: Re: Martial Arts Character
13: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
14: Re: Off in left field  -- software to build character
15: Re: Off in left field  -- software to build character
16: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
17: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
18: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
19: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
20: RE: Debt
21: Re: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
22: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
23: Re: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
24: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
25: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)

v04.n3217
 1: Developing a new Force Weapon
 2: Nuke explosions 
 3: Re: Nuke explosions
 4: Orbit-to-Ground Missiles
 5: Re: Nuke explosions 
 6: Re: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
 7: "Target has flooded a tube!"
 8: Sources for TL3 artillery?
 9: Re: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
10: Re: Improvised Weapons: (was Martial Arts)
11: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
12: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
13: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
14: RE: Re: Nuke explosions 
15: Re: Debt
16: throwing velocities?
17: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
18: RE: 
19: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
20: Re:Target has flooded a tube!
21: Re: Developing a new Force Weapon
22: Re: and Sling Question
23: Re: "Target has flooded a tube!"
24: The Sinking of the Hood
25: Aliens
26: RE: Re: Developing a new Force Weapon
27: RE: The Sinking of the Hood
28: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
29: Re: The Sinking of the Hood

v04.n3218
 1: RE: The Sinking of the Hood
 2: Re: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 3: Re: throwing velocities?
 4: character of the week #39a
 5: character of the week #39b
 6: re: target has flooded a tube
 7: re: aliens
 8: Re: debt
 9: Re: The size of a Dreadnought

v04.n3219
 1: Re: The size of a Dreadnought
 2: Nukes in space (was re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 3: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 4: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
 5: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 6: RE: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 7: Bizmarks fate 
 8: Re: debt (Russian Mafia)
 9: Space Navies (reply to several mails)
10: [VEHICLE] of the week 331 - TL11 electric car
11: Re: Buckshot Nuclear Space Bomblet.
12: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
13: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
14: re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
15: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
16: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
17: Re: Bizmarks fate 
18: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
19: Prevalency of CC2?
20: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
21: RE: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
22: Re: RealLife(tm) Kinetic Kill Railguns
23: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
24: COTW FYI
25: Re: Nukes in space (was re: The size of a Dreadnought)
26: Re: Nuke explosions
27: RE: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes

v04.n3220
 1: RE: Re: Buckshot Nuclear Space Bomblet.
 2: oh no not sluggy too!!!
 3: oh no not sluggy too!!!
 4: RE: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
 5: Re: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
 6: Re: Nuke explosions
 7: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
 8: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
 9: Warship Tech (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
10: Re: Nuke explosions
11: RE: Bizmarks fate 
12: Re: Nuke explosions
13: Re: [VEHICLE] three light helicopters, TL8
14: Re: Nuke explosions
15: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
16: RE: Re: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
17: RE: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes
18: RE: Bizmarks fate 
19: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
20: Re: Nuke explosions
21: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
22: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
23: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
24: Germany could have won.
25: Russians
26: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
27: Re:  Germany could have won.
28: Open call for players-
29: RE: Bizmarks fate
30: Re: Germany could have won.

v04.n3221
 1: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 2: Re:aliens
 3: Re: Prevalency of CC2?
 4: Re: Russians
 5: small is beautifull (fighters vs batttleships)
 6: Re: Germany could have won.
 7: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships
 8: The Bismark and tech advantage
 9: on line dice
10: on line dice
11: Re: on line dice
12: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
13: RE: Russians
14: RE: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
15: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
16: RE: Re: Russians
17: RE: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
18: Re: on line dice
19: how do you use gurps vehicles
20: Re: how do you use gurps vehicles
21: Re: RE: Re: Russians TL
22: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
23: Re: Re: Russians
24: RE: Re: Russians
25: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
26: Re: Re: Russians
27: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
28: Re: RE: Re: Russians TL
29: Re: Russians
30: Re: Bizmarks fate
31: Re: Russians

v04.n3222
 1: Re: Germany could have won.
 2: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
 3: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
 4: RE: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 5: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
 6: Swordfish (was: The Bismark and tech advantage)
 7: RE: Russians
 8: Re: debt (Russian Mafia)
 9: RE: Prevalency of CC2?
10: enemies was:Re: debt (Russian Mafia)
11: Re: enemies was:Re: debt (Russian Mafia)
12: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
13: You CAD!  RE: Prevalency of CC2?
14: Re: Bizmarks fate
15: RE: RE: Re: Russians
16: RE: Re: RE: Re: Russians TL
17: RE: Re: The Sinking of the Hood
18: RE: RE: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
19: explaining my sig (off-topic) was:Re: enemies was:Re: debt (Russian Mafia)
20: RE: Re: Re: Russians
21: Re: You CAD!  RE: Prevalency of CC2?
22: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
23: RE: RE: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
24: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
25: Re: Space Navies (was: The size of a Dreadnought)
26: Plane BUNNY!!

v04.n3223
 1: RE: gunfighters --> noncinematic
 2: RE: Bizmarks fate 
 3: Re: Swordfish (was: The Bismark and tech advantage)
 4: Re: The Bismark and tech advantage
 5: RE: Re: RE: Re: Russians TL
 6: RE: Re: Re: Russians
 7: RE: RE: Re: Russians
 8: RE: Bizmarks fate 
 9: Re: Swordfish (was: The Bismark and tech advantage)
10: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships
11: Re: Swordfish (was: The Bismark and tech advantage)
12: RE: Re: Re: Russians
13: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
14: RE: Plane BUNNY!!
15: RE: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
16: Early jets (was: Russians)
17: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships
18: Space Navies (was: dreadnougth and fighters and nukes)
19: Re: Space Navies (reply to orbit-to-ground weapons)
20: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
21: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8

v04.n3224
 1: Re: Swordfish
 2: Re: [VEHICLE] Shaitani medium hover tank, TL8
 3: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
 4: RE: Swordfish (was: The Bismark and tech advantage)
 5: Re: Small fighters vs Large ships (Re: The size of a Dreadnought)
 6: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
 7: Startin' on vehicles
 8: Designing Deities as Characters
 9: Re: Designing Deities as Characters
10: Re: Designing Deities as Characters
11: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
12: Re: Designing Deities as Characters
13: Re: Startin' on vehicles
14: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
15: Re: Plane BUNNY!!
16: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
17: Re: TL10 starship (was: how do you use gurps vehicles)
18: Re: Designing Deities as Characters
19: [STARSHIP] TL10 200 ston merchant
20: GURPS FACTORIES
21: Re: GURPS FACTORIES
22: RE: Re: Plane BUNNY!!